Donate

Comment will follow…

Title:

Roman Buchko on Soviet Film Amateurs: Excerpt from an Interview on November 1, 2012

[00:48:02 – 00:52:43]

Natalia Otrischenko: Could you tell us about the environment and people you worked with?

Roman Buchko: These individuals held various positions, engaging in a form of amateur activity. There was a methodologist for cinema and photography at the House of Folk Art, overseeing cultural affairs. Additionally, there was a people’s film studio in Drohobych under [the direction of] Adam Kotsko, and another in Stryi, something like Forward Ginseng Growers [Вперед женьшеньоводи], well, they produced films on topics of their interest. Those affiliated with trade unions mostly initiated such film studios. Bordiuk, for instance, was one such individual who had completed his studies at the Leningrad Institute through correspondence. He grew up in […], don’t really remember where […]. We also coordinated a festival on tourism, although it primarily featured slide films since not everyone had a camera. Anyway, these slide films were like movies, but static in the frame. There was often a soundtrack and sometimes these frames were coupled to eliminate pauses in between, it went seamless. The visuals were captivating, some background music, we saw bicycle trips or visits to the Baltic States. There were seven tourist sections including water workers, miners, cavers, cyclists, and more. This festival was held at the Tourist Hotel.

And those from places like Zvenyhorod—where I was born—were also involved. I had a keen interest in archaeology from a young age and documented everything for the Society for the Protection of Monuments, where I later worked. People passionate about such topics also contributed to the festival. When I was filming there, I pondered what I will capture. I persuaded to film there. It was believed that establishing a new film studio would be a significant accomplishment for the entire film club [Film Club of the House of Culture of Builders]. We had a leader for the cinema club, and a small avtovaz, which we used to travel to film various scenes around. We would venture near Belarus to film about wild honey and the beekeepers, including Uncle Tereshko, who made honey in Kolody with his bees. We had to move through many swamps for this footage.

So, there were approximately four officials in the film club. To secure funding for projects, we needed to show it functioned, but actually, it had achieved notable milestones and had to get a rank of “People’s Studio.” We were to receive an allocation of 120 rubles, and with this prize money, we could purchase basic equipment such as a camera, projector, tape recorder, and occasionally film, along with the necessary chemicals for film processing. There was a teacher Bohdan Zakalyk who I would assist in preserving those historical records. It might be stored somewhere. However, when it came to formalizing the existence of the studio, I had to use fake names for the participants. Like those films I made were, actually, co-authored, just to validate everything in official papers. Then we made a film project in Neslukhiv. We wanted to shoot a documentary about pomology, about 25-year history of gardening. By the way, we never completed the film. But we engaged Borovsky to add other films about nature to our list, so that to formally validate our finance. Borovsky himself had previously worked on projects in the area, as had Zakalyk and others. This was the atmosphere. There were a few dedicated persons who always watched these films; only the authors themselves, very few people attended screenings of these films, even at the republican festival.

Related sources:

Documents (3)

Image for “A Collective of Individuals.” Booklet of the Volyn Amateur Film Studio, 1987
“A Collective of Individuals.” Booklet of the Volyn Amateur Film Studio, 1987
The source provided below is a promotional booklet from the Soviet amateur film studio “Volyn,” located in Lutsk. Unlike studios that were under the authority of and funded by trade union organizations, this studio was affiliated with the oblast department of culture. The booklet highlights the achievements and activities of the studio. This type of publication was widely circulated and exchanged at competitions and festivals of various levels. The presence of such printed materials could further indicate the level of financial support for the studio.
Image for Program of the amateur film competition “For You, Motherland, Our Hard Work,” Kharkiv, 1974
Program of the amateur film competition “For You, Motherland, Our Hard Work,” Kharkiv, 1974
This program is part of the multi-stage film selection for the Soviet-wide competition “For You, Motherland, Our Hard Work.” It features a compilation of works from the most active studios in the Ukrainian SSR at the time, including film titles and authors’ names. It provides information on the gender and social distribution within the amateur filmmaking movement, as well as its geographic spread. It is striking to note that most listed authors are men. Characteristically, each name is accompanied by a profession, though not always accurate, highlighting the diversity of individuals involved in amateurism. Attention can also be drawn to the film titles and their formats. Many amateurs utilized the professional 35mm format,...
Image for Resolution on work of Lviv oblast amateur film studios, clubs, and cinematographers, 1986
Resolution on work of Lviv oblast amateur film studios, clubs, and cinematographers, 1986
This document is a resolution of the Lviv Oblast Council of Trade Unions regarding the organization of an oblast seminar for leaders of amateur film studios, clubs, and cinematographers. It is a common example illustrating the degree of formalization and bureaucratic structuring within the coordinated amateur film community during the Soviet era. In its contents, we discern a distinct chain of command prevalent within the inter-republican hierarchy: the Ukrainian Republican Council of Trade Unions — the Lviv Oblast Council of Trade Unions — the Lviv Oblast Club-Laboratory of Trade Union Cinematographers — People’s Film Studio (one among several).
Show more Collapse all

Images (2)

Image for Members of the cinema club in the village of Novooleksandrivka, Ukrainian SSR, during a film shoot, May 1981
Members of the cinema club in the village of Novooleksandrivka, Ukrainian SSR, during a film shoot, May 1981
In addition to film studios, which predominantly comprised adults, the network of amateur filmmaking also encompassed groups tailored for children and teenagers, typically organized within houses of culture or schools. Oversight of these groups was typically carried out by representatives from People’s Studios and local film clubs. The archival caption of this photograph reads as follows: “Members of the cinema club at the House of Culture in the village of Novoaleksandrovka, Belovodsk district, Voroshilovgrad oblast, during a film shoot. From left to right: students Naydysh A, Petrov P, the club’s leader Kolesnik V. I., student Burian V. — village Novoaleksandrovka, 15 May 1981, by Y. Khromushyn (outdoors against the backdrop of a river).”
Image for Film amateurs of the steam locomotive and car repair plant, photograph dated of 1956
Film amateurs of the steam locomotive and car repair plant, photograph dated of 1956
“The initiators of a film studio at the steam locomotive and truck repair plant (from the left to the right) Slutskyn S.S., Art Club Director of Tool and Inventory Shop, Skybalo G.L., Director of Radio Broadcasting Center, and Zirka A.V. are looking through the first shots of the new film about the plant, Lviv December 7th, 1956". This archival record accompanies this photograph in the Central State Audio/Visual and Electronic Archive (until the recent times called Central State G.S. Pshenychnyi Filming Archive) in Kyiv. Despite it is the official representation of film amateurs that was probably created for the purpose of media publications, careful analysis of the details makes it possible to discern...
Show more Collapse all

Videos (1)

Image for “Screen of Pryazovia” (Pryazovskyi Ekran) № 1, 1969
“Screen of Pryazovia” (Pryazovskyi Ekran) № 1, 1969
    This newsreel is a valuable source on the history of the development of the Mariupol industry. It was produced by the city club of film amateurs. Following the example of the Ukrkinochronika studio in the capital city which published the main newsreels in the republic, the authors of this piece created a short film report with 4 stories that tell about the deputies, the introduction of innovations in blast furnace steelmaking, about the winners of the socialist competition, and about the meeting of workers with a Soviet cosmonaut.
Show more Collapse all

Audio (0)

Show more Collapse all

Related modules (1)

The early vision of amateur filmmaking in the Soviet Union was characterized by the pragmatic idea of using the new media not only for entertainment but also to involve a wide range of citizens in the production of newsreels and to create a network of correspondents across the country to cover the construction of socialism. However, despite sporadic attempts, this idea was not immediately implemented on a large scale. The lack of technology and sufficient equipment, and later the political climate of the 1930s, hindered this. It was only after liberalization and Khrushchev's reforms that the idea reappeared on the agenda.
Worked on the material:
Research, comment

Oleksandr Makhanets

Interviewer

Natalia Otrishchenko

Translation into English

Yuliia Kulish

Comments and discussions